FBI:VELASCO, KENNEDY, OLLANTA, MORIRAAN

[nadie]

LOS POERUANOS NO EXISTEN, SOLO EXISTEN LA OLIGARQUIA Y LA FUERZA.

LOS HEROES DE LOS POBRES MUEREN, ESTADOS UNIDOS Y CHILE SON LOS DIOSES DE LOS CHUNCHITO COMO ELLOS NOS CALIFICAN.


OREMOS POR ELLOS , ALGUN DIA QUE LOS ARABES O LA CHINA LE HAGAN LA GUERRA , A VER SI LE VAMOS A PRESTAR APOYO.


OYE GRINGO METETE TU CORTINA DE HUMO, TU GUERA SUCIA SICO SOCIAL AL CULO.


MUCHOS PAISES DE SUDAMERICA NO CONCORDAMOS CON USTEDES PREGUNTALE AL PLAN COLOMBIA.


PREGUNTALE SI LOS VENEZOLANOS COLOMBIANOS Y PERUANOS Y BOLIVIANOS ESTIMAN MUCHO AL SEÑOR BUSH.


VAYANSE A LAMIERDA GRINGOS DE MIERDA.

[nadie]

A MI APORECIACIOON ES LA MEJOR OPCION , LO PRIMERO ESTAR A FAVOR DE LOS POBRES Y EL NACIONALISMOS POR QUE ESTO ES EL DESAROLLO.


CONSUMIR PRODUCTOS PERUANOS, IGUALAR,IMITAR, SUPERAR. LUEGO TENDREMOS LA DERROTA A LA POBREZA, ESTO SIEMPRE Y CUANDO LA BESTIA 666 BUSH
SE PIQUE Y QUIERA INVADIR EL PERU.


ALGUN DIA CAERA LA BESTIA.

[RAUL DE JULIACA]

SI VOTAREMOS POR OLLANTA

Imagínense si hasta en USA está haciendo estragos el NEOLIBERALISMO-CAPITALISMO-FONDOMONETARISMO, como NOSOTROS VAMOS ACEPTAR LA IMPOCISION DE ESTOS MODELOS AVALADOS POR LOURDES Y DEMAS CANDIDATOS, ESO JAMAS, SE ACABO, QUEREMOS CAMBIO POR ESO VOTAREMOS POR OLLANTA,....PARA CORROBORAR LO DICHO ALLI LES VA UN ESTUDIO REALIZADO EN USA POR DOS ORGANISMOS RECONOCIDOS.

Según estudios de dos centros de investigación
Crece brecha entre ricos y pobres en EEUU
Los ingresos de las familias que conforman 20% de los más pobres en Estados Unidos crecieron en 19% en los últimos 20 años, mientras que los ingresos de 20% que conforman la población más rica aumentaron 59%.
ABN
30 Enero 2006, 12:03 PM Aumentar Disminuir


Los ingresos de las familias que conforman 20% de los más pobres en Estados Unidos crecieron en 19% en los últimos 20 años, mientras que los ingresos de 20% que conforman la población más rica aumentaron 59%, lo que demuestra que la brecha entre ricos y pobres continúa en aumento en ese país, según revelan sendos estudios de dos centros de investigación.

Los estadounidenses Instituto de Política Económica y Centro sobre Prioridades Presupuestarias y Políticas hicieron su análisis tomando los datos del censo nacional de ese país y compararon el crecimiento promedio de los períodos de principios de los ochenta y noventa con el lapso 2001-2003.

Encontraron que los ingresos de 20% conformado por las familias más pobres crecieron en un promedio de 2.660 dólares (19%) en los últimos 20 años. Por otra parte, los ingresos de 20% conformado por las familias más ricas crecieron en un promedio de 45.100 dólares, casi 59%. Mientras tanto, las familias de clase media vieron un aumento de 28% en esos mismos 20 años, es decir, 10.218 dólares.

La explicación del incremento de estas desigualdades la encuentra Trudi Renwick, economista del Instituto de Política Fiscal, en la globalización, la caída de los trabajos de manufactura, la expansión de los trabajos con salarios bajos, la inmigración y el debilitamiento de los sindicatos. Por otra parte, el salario federal mínimo ha permanecido estático durante años.

El estudio también señala que este fuerte incremento de las diferencias entre los más ricos y los más pobres es marcadamente diferente al contraste experimentado en el período que comprende la salida de Estados Unidos de la Segunda Guerra Mundial y los años 70.

Dicha época, aunque estuvo signada por el capitalismo, no tenía como política económica el neoliberalismo salvaje que actualmente se quiere imponer al planeta.

Según uno de los autores de los estudios, el economista Jared Bernstein, cuando el crecimiento del ingreso se concentra en lo más alto de la escala social, la gente de los niveles bajos pasa tiempos muy difíciles tratando de evitar la pobreza y buscando darle a sus hijos un inicio decente de sus vidas.

Nueva York es el estado donde la brecha ha sido mayor, con las familias ricas ganando hasta 8,1 veces más que las pobres, mientras que Wyoming registró la menor, con incremento en 5,2 veces de los ingresos de los ricos.


EL QUE NO HA DECIDIDO ESPERO QUE POR FIN DECIDA POR QUE SI QUEREMOS IR POR EL ABISMO DONDE NOS QUIEREN LLEVAR LOS POLITIQUEROS,<LOURDES Y COMPAÑIA,...ADELANTE,...SI NO, SI SOÑAMOS CON UN PERU MEJOR Y UN MUNDO MEJOR DECIDAMOS POR UN CAMBIO,...YO YA DECIDI......OLLANTA ES EL LIDER DEL CAMBIO.

CHAU

[YOVITA131]

OLLANTA ES EL HIJO SONSO DE JUAN VELASCO E ISAAC HUMALA... NINGUNO DE ESOS 3 HA SIDO LIDER DE ALGO. ES UN TRISTE GALLINA QUE SE LE CORRE A DEBATES... Y SOLO SE CREE HOMBRCITO CON SU FUSIL... HASTA UN GIJOE DE PLASTICO ES MAS SERVIBLE QUE ESA MOFA DEL HIGADO SOCIAL.

OLLANTA HA HECHO QUE EL NACIONALISMO SE VUELVA CHAUVINISMO Y TAMBIEN ES OTRO QUE PROSTITUYE LA PALABRA PUEBLO.

VOTA POR KOECHLIN... NO LE HAGAS CASO AL EXTREMO NI AL MIEDO... POR UN PLAN A TIEMPO... VOTA POR EL CABALLO Y DEJA TUS DISCURSOS INSERVIBLES DE RESENTIMIENTO. TODO EL MUNDO SABE QUE ESTADOS UNIDOS NECESITA CREAR POLARIZACION PARA PODER SOBREVIVIR Y JUSTIFICAR SUS INVASIONES Y PARA ESO LOS CREA... NO CAIGAMOS EN LA POLARIZACION... VOTA POR KOECHLIN, POR EL CABALLO.

[el zorro solitario]

Los ingresos de las familias que conforman 20% de los más pobres en Estados Unidos crecieron en 19% en los últimos 20 años, mientras que los ingresos de 20% que conforman la población más rica aumentaron 59%, lo que demuestra que la brecha entre ricos y pobres continúa en aumento en ese país, según revelan sendos estudios de dos centros de investigación.

NUEVAMENTE TU IRRESPONSABILIDAD SE PONE DE MANIFIESTO. PORQUE NO ESCRIBES TODO EL REPORTE DE QUE EN LOS ULTIMOS ANOS LA POBLACION INDOCUMENTADA EN ESTADOS UNIDOS HA CRECIDO DE UNA MANERA DESPROPORCIONAL DE QUE LA GRAN MAYORIA DE LOS POBRES SON POBRES CEONICOS QUE FUERON O ESTAN SIENDO OBLIGADOS DE SALIR DEL WELFARE. ESTOS POBRES DESFORTUNADAMENTE NO PUEDEN SER AYUDADOS EFECTIVAMENTE YA QUE SON ALHOLICOS O DROGADICTOS QUE RECHAZAN TODA CLASE DE REHABILITACION, LOS INDOCUMENTADOS DESFORTUNADAMENTE POR LA FALTA DEL DOMINIO DEL IDIOMA Y POR SU FALTA DE CAPACITACION TECNICA SOLO TRABAJA POR EL MINIMO QUE VARIA APROXIMADAMENTE ENTRE 12,000 DOLARES (MINIMO FEDERAL) Y 15,000 DOLLARESAPROXIMADAMENTE DEPENDIENDO EN QUE ESTADO VIVAS ALLI TE MANDO UN REPORTE VERDADERO DE LA OFICINA DEL CENSO, TU DEMAGOGIA APESTA, NO SOY PEPECISTA Y NO SOY DERECHISTA PERO HAY QUE ARGUMENTAR CON BASES PARA TENER CREDIBILIDAD AHORA QUE TU ME DIGAS QUE AHORA ESTADOS UNIDOS ESTA PEOR QUE HACE 20 ANOS NO HAY DUDA PERO QUE EL SISTEMA ESTE COLPSANDO ESO ES TAN AMBIGUO COMO CREER QUE VENEZUELA ES UNA POTENCIA MUNDIAL.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
TUESDAY, AUGUST 30, 2005, AT 10:10 A.M. EDT



CB05-125

Public Information Office Press kit / Reports
(301) 763-3030/763-3691 Income data
(301) 457-3670 (fax) Poverty data
(301) 457-1037 (TDD) Health insurance coverage data
e-mail: <pio@census.gov> American Community Survey data

Income Stable, Poverty Rate Increases, Percentage of Americans
Without Health Insurance Unchanged


Real median household income remained unchanged between 2003 and 2004 at $44,389, according to a report released today by the U.S. Census Bureau. Meanwhile, the nation’s official poverty rate rose from 12.5 percent in 2003 to 12.7 percent in 2004. The percentage of the nation’s population without health insurance coverage remained stable, at 15.7 percent in 2004. The number of people with health insurance increased by 2.0 million to 245.3 million between 2003 and 2004, and the number without such coverage rose by 800,000 to 45.8 million.

These findings are contained in the Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2004 [PDF] report. The report’s data were compiled from information collected in the 2005 Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC) to the Current Population Survey (CPS).



Source of Estimates and Statistical Accuracy
As with all surveys, the estimates may differ from the actual values because of sampling variation or other factors. All statements in this news release have undergone statistical testing, and all comparisons are significant at the 90-percent confidence level, unless otherwise noted.


Also released today were tabulations from the 2004 American Community Survey (ACS), some of which are included in the report: Income, Earnings and Poverty from the 2004 American Community Survey [PDF].

The ACS is a powerful new tool. In the past, local policymakers had to choose between using old local data from the last census and new national data. The ACS provides a new level of local timeliness, giving policymakers current local data. Gathered from the largest household survey in the United States, the ACS data herein is based on the collection of information from 800,000 addresses sampled during the 2004 survey period.

The fact sheet, Differences Between the Income and Poverty Estimates From the American Community Survey and the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement, provides information on the differences in concepts and purposes of the ACS and the CPS.

Current Population Survey

The 2005 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement shows the following results:

Income

Overview

2004 marked the second consecutive year in which real median household income showed no change.
Race and Hispanic Origin

Real median household income did not change between 2003 and 2004 for non-Hispanic whites, blacks or Asians or for households with Hispanic householders.


Black households had the lowest median income in 2004 ($30,134) among race groups. Asian households had the highest median income ($57,518). The median income for non-Hispanic white households was $48,977. Median income for Hispanic households was $34,241.


Comparison of two-year moving averages (2002-2003 and 2003-2004) showed that the real median income for households with householders who reported American Indian and Alaska native as their race was statistically unchanged. The same was true for native Hawaiian and other Pacific islander households.
Regions

Real median household income remained unchanged between 2003 and 2004 in three of the four census regions — Northeast ($47,994), West ($47,680) and South ($40,773). The exception was the Midwest, where income declined 2.8 percent, to $44,657. The difference in income between the Northeast and West was not statistically significant.


The South continued to have the lowest median household income of all four regions. The Northeast and West had the highest incomes among regions.
Nativity

Real median income remained unchanged for native as well as for foreign-born households between 2003 and 2004. Native and foreign-born households had a median income in 2004 of $45,319 and $39,421, respectively.
EarningsReal median earnings of men age 15 and older who worked full-time, year-round declined 2.3 percent between 2003 and 2004, to $40,798. Women with similar work experience saw their earnings decline by 1.0 percent, to $31,223. Reflecting the larger fall in the earnings of men, the ratio of female-to-male earnings for full-time, year-round workers was 77 cents on the dollar, up from 76 cents in 2003.
Poverty

Overview

There were 37.0 million people in poverty (12.7 percent) in 2004, up from 35.9 million (12.5 percent) in 2003.


There were 7.9 million families in poverty in 2004, up from 7.6 million in 2003. The poverty rate for families remained unchanged at 10.2 percent. The poverty rate and the number in poverty showed no change for the different type of families.


As defined by the Office of Management and Budget and updated for inflation using the Consumer Price Index, the average poverty threshold for a family of four in 2004 was an income of $19,307; for a family of three, $15,067; for a family of two, $12,334; and for unrelated individuals, $9,645.
Race and Hispanic Origin (Race data refer to people reporting a single race only.)

In 2004, the poverty rate declined for Asians (9.8 percent in 2004, down from 11.8 percent in 2003), remained unchanged for Hispanics (21.9 percent) and blacks (24.7 percent) and rose for non-Hispanic whites (8.6 percent in 2004, up from 8.2 percent in 2003).


The poverty rate of American Indians and Alaska natives did not change when comparing two-year averages for 2002-2003 and 2003-2004. The same was true of native Hawaiians and other Pacific islanders.
Age

For all children under 18, both the 2004 poverty rate (17.8 percent) and the number in poverty (13.0 million) were unchanged from 2003.


The poverty rate increased for people 18 to 64 years old (from 10.8 percent in 2003 to 11.3 percent in 2004), but declined for those age 65 and older (from 10.2 percent in 2003 to 9.8 percent in 2004).
Nativity

The native-born population had increases in both their poverty rate (from 11.8 percent in 2003 to 12.1 percent in 2004) and their number in poverty (from 30.0 million in 2003 to 31.0 million in 2004). Foreign-born naturalized citizens had a 2004 poverty rate of 9.8 percent, compared with 21.6 percent for those who had not become citizens; both rates were unchanged from 2003.
Regions

The Midwest was the only region to show an increase in their poverty rate – 11.6 percent in 2004, up from 10.7 percent in 2003. In 2004, the poverty rates for the Northeast (11.6 percent), South (14.1 percent) and West (12.6 percent) were unchanged from 2003. The South continued to have the highest poverty rate.
Health Insurance Coverage

Overview

The percentage of the nation’s population without health insurance coverage remained unchanged, at 15.7 percent in 2004.


The percentage of people covered by employment-based health insurance declined from 60.4 percent in 2003 to 59.8 percent in 2004.


The percentage of people covered by government health insurance programs rose in 2004, from 26.6 percent to 27.2 percent, driven by increases in the percentage of people with Medicaid coverage, from 12.4 percent in 2003 to 12.9 percent in 2004.


The proportion and number of uninsured children did not change in 2004, remaining at 11.2 percent or 8.3 million.
Race and Hispanic Origin (Race data refer to those reporting a single race only.)

The uninsured rate in 2004 was 11.3 percent for non-Hispanic whites and 19.7 percent for blacks, both unchanged from 2003. The uninsured rate for Asians declined from 18.8 percent to 16.8 percent.


The uninsured rate for Hispanics, who may be of any race, was 32.7 percent in 2004 — unchanged from 2003.


Based on a three-year average (2002-2004), 29.0 percent of people who reported American Indian and Alaska native as their race were without coverage, higher than the rate for native Hawaiians and other Pacific islanders (21.8 percent) and for those of other race groups, but lower than that of Hispanics. Comparisons of two-year moving averages (2002-2003 and 2003-2004) showed that the uninsured rates for American Indians and Alaska natives and for native Hawaiians and other Pacific islanders did not change.
Nativity

While the proportion of the foreign-born population without health insurance in 2004 (33.7 percent) was unchanged from 2003, the rate for the native-born population increased (from 13.0 percent in 2003 to 13.3 percent in 2004).
Regions

The Midwest had the lowest uninsured rate in 2004 (at 11.9 percent), followed by the Northeast (13.2 percent), the West (17.4 percent) and the South (18.3 percent).
American Community Survey

The national findings regarding median income and poverty rate are consistent between the CPS and the ACS. When examining localities of 250,000 or more residents, the 2004 American Community Survey shows the following results concerning income, poverty and earnings:

Income

For counties of 250,000 or more people in 2004, median household income ranged from $88,133 in Fairfax County, Va., to $24,778 in Hidalgo County, Texas. For cities of similar size, median household incomes ranged from $71,765 in San Jose, Calif., to $24,031 in Miami, Fla.


Among the 37 counties with populations of 1 million or more in 2004, 32 experienced no statistically significant change in median household income from 2003 to 2004. Three counties (King, Wash.; Palm Beach, Fla.; and Philadelphia, Pa.) experienced declines; two counties (Fairfax, Va.; and Orange, Calif.) showed increase.
Poverty

Among counties with 250,000 or more people in 2004, poverty rates ranged from 2.6 percent in Johnson, Kan., to 43.6 percent in Hidalgo, Texas. Among places of a similar size, the poverty rates ranged from 7.4 percent for Anchorage, Alaska, to 33.6 percent for Detroit.


Among the 37 counties with 1 million or more people in 2004, seven experienced changes in their poverty rates between 2003 and 2004. Of those seven, Broward, Fla., and Oakland, Mich., showed decreases, while Allegheny, Pa., Bronx, N.Y.; King, Wash.; Nassau, N.Y.; and Wayne, Mich., had increases. Among the nine cities of this size, New York, N.Y., saw its poverty rate rise, while poverty in the other places remained unchanged.
Earnings

Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and the District of Columbia had among the highest median earnings for both men and women who worked full-time, year-round.


In each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, women’s earnings were less than men’s in 2004. The District of Columbia was the area with the greatest parity between men’s and women’s earnings. There, women earned 91 cents for every dollar that men earned.
Earnings by Industry

Among the 20 major industry sectors, men earned the most in 2004 in the management of companies and enterprises sector ($77,754). For women, there were five sectors where median earnings were about $40,000 or more: management of companies and enterprises ($41,608); mining ($41,516); professional, scientific and technical services ($41,398); utilities ($40,981); and information ($40,447).


In each of the major industry sectors, men earned more than women. The sectors where the earnings gap between men and women was the largest were management of companies and enterprises, where women earned 54 cents for every dollar that men earned; finance and insurance (57 cents); and professional, scientific and technical services (60 cents).
Earnings by Occupation

Among the 22 major occupational groups, men earned the most in legal occupations, such as lawyers, judges and law clerks (more than $100,000). Among women, those in computer and mathematical occupations had the highest median earnings ($56,585).


Among the major occupational groups, women’s earnings as a percentage of men’s earnings were about 90 percent or higher for the following groups: installation, maintenance and repair; community and social services; construction and extraction; and healthcare support. In contrast, women’s earnings as a percentage of men’s earnings were about 65 percent or less for legal occupations, sales and related occupations and healthcare practitioner and technical occupations.
Estimates from the CPS ASEC may not match the estimates from the ACS because of differences in the questionnaires, data collection methodology, reference period, processing procedures, etc. Both are surveys and are subject to sampling and nonsampling errors. All comparisons made in the report have been tested and found to be statistically significant at the 90-percent confidence level, unless otherwise noted.

For additional information on the CPS data, visit <[urlsrc=http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/p60_229sa.pdf>[/url]. For additional information on ACS data, visit <[urlsrc=http://www.census.gov/acs/www/UseData/Accuracy/Accuracy1.htm>[/url].


-X-

[RAUL DE JULIACA]

che te recomiendo que cuando envies o escribas lo hagas en español , aqui no estamos en USA, alla uds. si quieren seguir de limpia pisos, los mismos gringos dicen que tienen una bomba de tiempo por que por un lado la pobreza se incrementa y por otro lado su juventud en la peor crisis moral, los jovenes drogadictos en casi 80% y las jovenes a los 8 años ya conocen todo de todo y sabe sa que me refiero, aun en nuestro Pais la moral familiar se conserva, y se puede salvar, el USA deben ir a buscar soldados a Latinoamerica y el caribe por que ellos ya ni eso tienen para afrontar sus invasiones.
DESDE LATINOAMERICA VEREMOS SENTADOS Y EN ESTA HUMILDE TRIBUNA LA CAIDA DEL IMPERIO. NO HAY MAL QUE DURE 100 AÑOS NI CUERPO QUE LO RECISTA

Chau Gringo

[el zorro solitario]

che te recomiendo que cuando envies o escribas lo hagas en español , aqui no estamos en USA, alla uds. si quieren seguir de limpia pisos, los mismos gringos dicen que tienen una bomba de tiempo por que por un lado la pobreza se incrementa y por otro lado su juventud en la peor crisis moral, los jovenes drogadictos en casi 80% y las jovenes a los 8 años ya conocen todo de todo y sabe sa que me refiero, aun en nuestro Pais la moral familiar se conserva, y se puede salvar, el USA deben ir a buscar soldados a Latinoamerica y el caribe por que ellos ya ni eso tienen para afrontar sus invasiones.
DESDE LATINOAMERICA VEREMOS SENTADOS Y EN ESTA HUMILDE TRIBUNA LA CAIDA DEL IMPERIO. NO HAY MAL QUE DURE 100 AÑOS NI CUERPO QUE LO RECISTA

Chau Gringo
VEO QUE AHORA TE DAS DE ARGENTINO CON LO DEL CHE, BUENO AL PUNTO NO ES MI CULPA QUE TUS COMPLEJOS Y LIMITACIONES NO TE HAYAN DEJADO APRENDER INGLES, PERO NO TODOS SOMOS COMO TU QUE NOS GUSTA ADULTERAR LA INFORMACION, ESE DOCUMENTO QUE PUSE EN EL FORO ES EL DOCUMENTO ORIGINAL DE LA OFICINA DEL CENSO DE USA PERO YA QUE ERES TAN LIMITADO TE VOY A DAR 2 CIFRAS PARA QUE NO SIGAS ESCRIBIENDO VERDADES PARCIALES QUE FALTAN A LA VERDAD, TU UNICO PROPOSITO ES CONFUNDIR A LA POBLACION EL PROMEDIO AL ANO PER CAPITA DE EXTRANJEROS VIVIENDO EN ESTADOS UNIDOS ES $39,421 DOLLARES ESTAMOS HABLANDO DE PROMEDIOS Y PARA HISPANOS ES $34,241 DOLARES
BUENO TE VOY A DESILUCIONAR, NO LIMPIO PISOS ASI COMO TU TE JACTAS DE SER UN INGENIERO MEDIOCRE, BUENO TE DIRE QUE YO MIS ESTUDIOS SUPERIORES LOS HICE EN USA CON TODAS LAS ACREDITACIONES DEL CASO, Y TAMBIEN SOY UN ADVOCADO A DEFENDER LOS DERECHOS DE LOS MENOS PRIVELEGIADOS EN ESTE PAIS NO IMPORTANDO SU CONDICION LEGAL, ESO LO HAGO COMO VOLUNTARIO, YA QUE MI TRABAJO LO REALIZO EN LA INDUSTRIA PRIVADA, POR ESO TE PUEDO DECIR QUE TU RESNTIMIENTO ENFERMISO Y TUS COMPLEJOS TE QUITAN OBJETIVIDAD YO SOLO TE ESTOY BRINDANDO INFORMACION DE PRIMERA FUENTE SIN ADULTERACIONES COMO TU LO HACES EDITANDO LA INFORMACION.
JAJAJAAJAJAJA TU IRRESPONSABILIDAD ES COMICA DE DONDE SACAS ESAS ESTADISTICAS DE QUE DE CADA 10 ESTUDIANTES 8 SON DROGADICTOS EL PORCENTAJE LAMENTABLEMENTE ES ALTO PERO NO LLEGA AL 30%. DE QUE MORALIDAD HABLAS, POR FAVOR NO VES QUE ESTAMOS VIVENDO LA MAYOR CRISIS SOCIAL DE NUESTRA HISTORIA. SE OBJETIVO Y DEJA DE DARNOS ESTADISTICAS FALSAS.
NO SE DE QUE SOLDADOS HABLAS ME IMAGINO QUE TE REFIERES A LOS SOLDADOS PUERTO RIQUENOS, PERO NUEVAMENTE TUS NUMEROS ADULTERADOS SON UNA BURLA AL FORO EL EJERCITO AMERICANO ES BLANCO EN UN 70% Y EL RESTO MINORIAS. Y ASI TE PESE ES EL MEJOR EJERCITO DEL MUNDO. Y ASI TE ARDA NO SOY GRINGO SOY BIEN PERUANO, DEJANDO EL NOMBRE DEL PERU BIEN EN ALTO CUANDO LA OPORTUNIDAD SE PRESENTA, SIGUE CON TU COMPLEJOS Y REVANCHISMOS. TE RECOMENDARIA QUE LEAS LA BIOGRAFIA DE JOSEPHINE BAKER DERREPENTE APRENDES ALGO.

[nadie]

Y CHUPALE EL CULO A BUSH LA BESTIA 666

[el zorro solitario]

Y CHUPALE EL CULO A BUSH LA BESTIA 666
JAJAJAJAJAAJA , HABER DIME QUE CONTRIBUCION PODRIAS TU OFRECERLE AL PERU MAS ALLA DE ROBAR?

[oscar izarra]

continuas con la actividad intelctual. ojala tu unica neurna no muera de soledad